EU Presidency: Economic and Financial Affairs Council

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My right honourable friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I will chair the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) on 6 December 2005. The Paymaster General, Dawn Primarolo MP, will represent the UK. Items on the agenda are:
	Economic reform: Council will consider two reports from the Economic Policy Committee on responding to the challenges of globalisation and Lisbon national reform programmes.
	Regulatory reform: Stock-take and look ahead to 2006.
	Fiscal issues: VAT reduced rates; following discussion at ECOFIN in November, Ministers will consider a proposal on VAT reduced rates.
	Fiscal issues: Code of conduct report; Ministers will discuss and be asked to adopt a report by the Code of Conduct Group.
	Financial services: Post-financial services action plan; Commissioner McCreevy will give a presentation on the forthcoming Commission White Paper.
	Combating terrorism: Payments regulation on wire transfers: ECOFIN will consider its general approach based on the Commission proposal.
	Combating terrorism: Action plan update; council will take note of progress on the EU's Counter-terror Action Plan.
	Oil market and related energy issues; Commissioner Piebalgs will update the council on the Commission's work.

EU Presidency: Energy Council

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: My honourable friend the Minister of State for Energy (Malcolm Wicks) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I chaired, for the UK presidency of the EU, the Energy Council in Brussels on 1 December. Alun Michael represented the UK.
	The council considered several matters of interest to the UK; chief among these were better regulation in the context of implementation of the EU's liberalised electricity and natural gas market, climate change and sustainable energy, and EU relations with third countries. There was an important and substantive debate throughout around the energy agenda discussed recently at Hampton Court, and the balance between our three key objectives of competitive markets, security of supply and tackling climate change. Member states recognised the important potential contribution from a European energy policy and supported Commission plans for taking this forward, through a Green Paper early in 2006, with a view to reporting to the 2006 December European Council.
	On market liberalisation, there was broad consensus that secure electricity and gas supplies at competitive prices, delivered on open, transparent and competitive markets are crucial to Europe's competitiveness; and that full implementation of the second electricity and gas directives was crucial. The Commission report on the internal energy market and the competition inquiry into the energy sector highlighted areas for more work, including more effective action by the Commission and national regulators against anti-competitive behaviour. Member states saw no need for further legislation until there had been more investigation into key issues such as market concentration, long-term contracts and the impact of the Emissions Trading Scheme. They agreed that the main issues for developing an effective internal energy market—such as independent and effective regulation, the development of regional markets, effective unbundling, and transparency—could be done within the existing framework.
	One member state rejected the Commission analysis of market shortcomings, claiming that a period of regulatory stability was needed and that competition contributed to the EU's energy problems as much as it helped to resolve them. Some member states expressed concern at their dependence on particular energy suppliers, noting that similar liberalisation to the EU's was needed in such countries.
	Council conclusions were agreed on climate change and energy efficiency. Energy efficiency was recognised as making an important contribution to the three primary energy objectives. Member states saw the expected agreement on the Energy End-Use Efficiency and Energy Services Directive as welcome in this respect. Several member states expressed concerns about the operation of the Emissions Trading Scheme and the need to revise the scheme before the next phase.
	On EU-third country relations, the presidency and Commission summarised progress on dialogues with key energy partners. On Russia, the successful Permanent Partnership Council held in October signalled real hope of progress. There would be a second ministerial meeting with OPEC on 2 December to develop the dialogue begun earlier in the year and promote mutual understanding. The energy treaty signed with south-east European countries would establish a neighbouring regional market on the same lines as the EU internal market. A key issue at the energy charter treaty's annual conference on 9 December would be how to take forward the negotiations on the transit protocol.

EU Presidency: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council

Lord Sainsbury of Turville: My right honourable friend the Minister of State for Industry and the Regions (Alun Michael) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	I chaired the telecoms part of the Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council of the UK's EU presidency in Brussels on 1 December 2005.
	The council began informally over lunch, where I chaired a policy debate on the 2006 review of the regulatory framework for electronic communications markets. The council agreed that the framework plays a key role in the development of open and competitive ICT markets. There was broad consensus that its implementation needs to be improved and that the review of the framework is a high priority for 2006. I was pleased that the council gave a steer on the key issues for the review. These included the importance of competition and investment in next-generation networks, ensuring a light-touch regulatory approach and the importance of the needs of consumers.
	The policy debate then continued in formal session with a focus on the future of EU spectrum policy. The council agreed that spectrum is a valuable economic and social resource and that its management needs to be more flexible and efficient. However, views were divided about the role that market-based mechanisms and harmonisation should play in determining spectrum policy. There was broad support for further discussion and analysis on this important issue, particularly in light of the spectrum which will be released by the switchover from analogue television.
	I then chaired a policy debate on the Commission's i2010 Strategy. This was a public open session. I reported on the successful events held as part of our presidency, including the gathering of chief executives on 8 and 9 July and the i2010 and e-accessibility conferences held in London on 6 September and 21 October respectively. Evidence from the Disability Rights Commission prepared for the second of these conferences showed that websites that failed to meet the e-accessibility standards were 50 per cent more difficult for all individuals to use, demonstrating that accessibility is an economic issue as well as an equalities issue. There was broad support for the i2010 Strategy and its three objectives to promote open and competitive markets, to strengthen ICT research and to achieve an inclusive information society. The council discussed particular priority areas within the i2010 Strategy's three themes. These included the need for appropriate policy actions in the regulatory field, on broadband and content and on e-government and e-accessibility. There was agreement that the i2010 Strategy needs to be implemented effectively if its contribution to the Lisbon agenda is to be realised. I am pleased to report that at the end of this debate the council adopted council conclusions on the i2010 Strategy and on e-accessibility.
	The council also adopted conclusions without debate on the subject of the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting. These conclusions highlight the intention of member states to complete the switchover, as far as possible, by the end of 2012.
	Finally, I reported on the successful outcome on Internet governance at the World Summit on the Information Society and I highlighted the key role of the EU under our presidency in facilitating the compromise position. The agreement reached will provide a sound basis for delivering enhanced co-operation, and the response from the commissioner and the council was very positive indeed.

Iraq: Reserve Forces

Lord Rooker: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence (Dr John Reid) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In line with our policy of employing the reserves as an integral component of the Armed Forces, and our normal pattern in Operation TELIC, we shall shortly begin mobilising approximately 700 reservists to deploy as part of the integrated UK force package on operations in Iraq (Operation TELIC). Reservists currently deployed in Iraq carry out a range of activities including medical support, force protection duties and providing individual reinforcements to units. We anticipate that most of these tasks will continue.
	We plan to issue the callout notices for reservists in phases and aim to give individuals 28 days' notice of call-up (other than for those who may volunteer to be mobilised at shorter notice). As is customary, to ensure that we successfully mobilise the required number, we will need to issue a greater number of callout notices than the actual requirement. On current plans, we will be issuing around 800 callout notices.
	Mobilisation will be followed by a period of training, integration into receiving units, and then a short period of pre-deployment leave. Deployment to theatre is expected to begin in May 2006. The majority of those called out can expect a deployed tour of six months and a total period of mobilisation, including post-tour leave, of around 11 months, though for a few it may be slightly longer.
	I would like to emphasise that this callout is part of our routine management of UK forces deployed on Operation TELIC. We and our multinational force partners will consider, in the months ahead, the levels and dispositions of forces required in Iraq to continue to build the capability and capacity of the Iraqi security forces and support the Iraqi Government up to and following the first full democratic elections in Iraq, which will be held in December.
	The next major routine roulement of regular UK forces in Iraq is due to take place during April and May next year and the lead formation, currently 7th Armoured Brigade, will be provided by 20th Armoured Brigade. We will make a further announcement covering this roulement once the details have been finalised.

Ministry of Defence: Votes A 2006–07

Lord Rooker: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence (Dr John Reid) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	Ministry of Defence Votes A seek the maximum numbers of personnel to be maintained for service in the Armed Forces during each financial year.
	As of 1 April 2006, we are amending the presentational format. The figures for the "Commonwealth troops in the United Kingdom" category will no longer be reported, and the numbers of the Queen Alexandra's Royal Army Nursing Corps and Princess Mary's Royal Air Force Nursing Service will be incorporated into those of the Regular Army and Regular Air Force.
	The Commonwealth troops accounted for by the Army and RAF are members of Commonwealth forces. The numbers are predominantly students attending courses, the remainder being those on exchange and attaché duties. The Commonwealth troops, like those of other non-commonwealth nations, wear the uniform of and are paid and maintained by their home nation. They are not members of the UK Armed Forces nor maintained for service with the UK Armed Forces and therefore fall outside the ambit of Votes A.
	Originally the nursing service was not a fully integrated part of the services, its members being non-combatants. However, they are now fully integrated and are now regarded as a sub-specialism and as such it is no longer appropriate to record these figures separately within Votes A.

Northern Ireland Police Ombudsman

Lord Rooker: My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Peter Hain) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	The Government have received a report from the Chief Inspector of Criminal Justice in Northern Ireland on the Office of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (OPONI). The report has today been published.
	The Government welcome this report, which recognises the good progress made by the Police Ombudsman's office towards fulfilling its important role of providing a fair and impartial independent police complaints system. The report also makes some helpful recommendations, which the Police Ombudsman will address in striving for continuous improvement in the way that OPONI fulfils its investigatory, monitoring and accountability roles and responsibilities.
	Copies of the chief inspector's report have been placed in the Library.

Northern Ireland: Oversight Commissioner's Report

Lord Rooker: My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Shaun Woodward) has made the following Ministerial Statement.
	I have today laid before this House a copy of the Oversight Commissioner's third statutory report for 2005 which was published today, in accordance with Section 68(4)(a) of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000.
	This is the sixth report compiled by Al Hutchinson as Oversight Commissioner and the 15th in the series of oversight reports published since 2001.
	I met yesterday with the Oversight Commissioner and welcomed the opportunity to discuss with him the contents of this thematic report on training.